This is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past. Even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it.
Preserving historical architecture building regardless the cost has become controversial topic. The topic is compelling two arguments that preserving historical building is important enough to do so regardless the cost or the society should invest those maintenance funds to improve people's quality of live. In this essay will further elaborate both sides arguments and will end my opinion.
Architecture building is playing a significant role as part of human heritage. They show the society value and belief at that point of historical time. Society value and belief are important to us shaping our society today. Most of ancient architect design buildings built a hundred year ago which involved an enormous amount of highly skilled craftsmanship, accurate structural calculus and incredible building design skill. The building itself is a piece of art. It would be shameful allowing the building deteriorating and out of shape of its glory caused by ignorance and lack of maintenance works.
Despite cost of maintenance works of ancient building cannot be underestimated due to those buildings are involving highly skilled craft man works and structural strengthen tasks. The fact of truth is whenever spending taxpayer money that always creates an enormous tension between different beneficiary groups in the society. For example, Medicare and education are the most expensive expenditures of many governments. It is arguable that those monies can spend on hospital beds or education system. Society member can enjoy the benefits directly.
In my opinion, I incline to agree that investing into our historical building is very important to our society. To know and understanding our history from historical building is invaluable. An efficient resources allocation will able to fulfill both sides of arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...ncient architect design buildings built hundred years ago that were involving enormous ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... buildings built hundred years ago that were involving enormous amount of highly skilled craft...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...stimated, particularly, those buildings are involving highly skilled craft man works and stru...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ral strengthen tasks. The fact of truth is specifically involving in taxpayer money that always creates e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'those moneys', 'those monies'?
Suggestion: this money; those moneys; those monies
...f many governments. It is arguable that those money can spend on hospital beds or education...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...al building is invaluable. An efficient resources allocation will able to fulfill both si...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69090909091 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0542727151 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589090909091 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.001871301 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0588235294 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1764705882 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35294117647 7.25397266985 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186360162374 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513962332096 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423168537593 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107147654145 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497644039808 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.