This is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past. Even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it.
Preserving historical architecture building regardless the cost has become controversial topic. The topic is compelling two arguments that preserving historical building is important enough to do so regardless the cost or the society should invest those maintenance funds to improve people's quality of live. In this essay will further elaborate both sides arguments and will end my opinion.
Architecture building is playing a significant role as part of human heritage. They show the society value and belief at that point of historical time. Society value and belief are important to us shaping our society today. Most of ancient architect design buildings built a hundred year ago which involved an enormous amount of highly skilled craftsmanship, accurate structural calculus and incredible building design skill. The building itself is a piece of art. It would be shameful allowing the building deteriorating and out of shape of its glory caused by ignorance and lack of maintenance works.
Despite cost of maintenance works of ancient building cannot be underestimated due to those buildings are involving highly skilled craft man works and structural strengthen tasks. The fact of truth is when spending taxpayer money that always creates an enormous tension between different beneficiary groups in the society. For example, Medicare and education are the most expensive expenditures of many governments. It is arguable that those monies can spend on hospital beds or education system. Society member can gain the benefits directly.
In my opinion, I incline to agree that investing into our historical building is very important to our society. To know and understanding our history from historical building is invaluable. An efficient resources allocation will able to fulfill both sides of arguments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...e underestimated due to those buildings are involving highly skilled craft man works and stru...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
...al building is invaluable. An efficient resources allocation will able to fulfill both si...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55395683453 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99008938708 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604316546763 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8125204866 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8235294118 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3529411765 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35294117647 7.25397266985 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185876053014 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512529716248 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415957373495 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106821872696 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048988804873 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.