Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of solving pollution problems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of the best ways are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing to increase the price of fuels can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, increasing the price of fuels can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of effective methods, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of solving pollution problems. Thus, beneficial ramifications of sustainable energies are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, the increased price of fuels can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of contaminated substances are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described negligible pollution problems. Hence, predicted outcomes of costly means are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of increasing the price of fuels far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of solved pollution problems prove the significance of an efficient approach, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63829787234 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18357600495 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629787234043 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3887494608 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.454545455 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289968452981 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861514659348 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537205341268 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160314820278 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317986254161 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.