Recently, the phenomenon of more fuels consumption and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that increasing the price of fuels cannot solve the pollution problems, such an idea regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that expensive fossil fuels can be a plus for the problem, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree to increase the price of fuels such as oil and gas as the best way to solve the air pollution. To begin with, expensive fuels could involve poor people with many financial problems. However, a lower amount of fuel burning could improve very environmental problems. For example, lower fuel consumption reduces greenhouse gas emissions.
In addition, people can change fossil fuels with renewable energies that are more expensive to buy. But, the governments should present cheap renewable energies for poor people to help decrease the Carbon Dioxide in the atmosphere. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2018 has shown that a significant number of advanced countries encourage their societies to use more renewable energies such as solar energy to solve the global warming issue and also the climate change.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of expensive fossil fuels far outweighed its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of more fuels c...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion reduces greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, people can change fossil fu...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing issue and also the climate change. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1290.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39748953975 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90134706889 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589958158996 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0355539254 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.272727273 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1818181818 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264887224865 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999882610079 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0891101317839 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15136869949 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906788914723 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.