Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the rapid progress of mass communication and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of mass communication is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. In this essay, we will discuss the advantageous and disadvantageous of the rapid progress of mass communication.
To begin with, the advantageous of mass media would be include, speed, accessibility and be more convenient. Mass communication can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that boost in speed as well as accessibility, are inextricably bound up. For instance, instead of face-to-face communication with a friend, we can tweet them wherever or whenever we preferred. Thus, the beneficial consequences of the boost in speed and tweeting apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, mass communication has some noticeable drawbacks such as the invasion of privacy and separating people emotionally. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of invasion of privacy related to this reality that with the aim of mass communication, email hacking would be easier. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downsides of mass media is correlated negatively with cybercrimes. Hence, it is correct to presume mass media is a renowned way to misuse private information.
To conclude, we analyze the advantageous and disadvantageous of the rapid change in communication and in my point of view, the impacts of the cons are more severe than the advantageous influence on mankind's life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...boost in speed as well as accessibility, are inextricably bound up. For instance,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53256704981 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48004944176 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4017230738 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159150967563 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583820920621 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379731005013 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0886746996136 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249168788473 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.