Internet or media is bad for young people because they make the young generation poor in
communication and forming relationships. Do you agree with this opinion? Please use examples or your personal experience to support your idea.
Recently, the effects of the internet on young people phenomenon and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of forming relationships is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mass media can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, consequences of using social media for young generation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of tools of communication, as well as means of communication, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a dramatic change in family relationships. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both family bond and social media apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, making poor communication might increase the consequences of an undermined family bond. Moreover, fundamental aspects of social relationships could relate to this reality that the demerits of channels of communication, pertain to lack of social activities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of overusing cyberspace is correlated negatively with adolescent's behavior. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of vast virtual space.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that using the internet among younger adults far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of communication skills prove the significance of the close relationship, but also pinpoint social interaction implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1549.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67399267399 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38491665722 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641025641026 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2913732386 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.083333333 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148312772919 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442541659757 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348722187867 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783657026856 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301511477381 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.