In social conversation both talking and listening play an important role to communicate without any barrier. It is believed by some that being a good listener is better than a skillful talker. I agree with this notion, despite the quality of a better talker who can explain any thought and idea without any hesitation, it is the listening trait of a person makes conversation fruitful. This essay will discuss aforementioned points and offer logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are several reasons why being a skillful listener is considered better than a talker but the most conspicuous on stems from the fact that listening involves the understanding of facts of a person who speaks in a talk.
To cite an example, there are many occasion when a person asks question to a speaker in a meeting and speaker starts answering the question which is completely opposite. So a good listener has the ability to understand the context and talk of a person and this allows listener to respond in an appropriate way.
However, It has to be admitted that smooth communication with others can be of vital importance, and one argument in favor of this view can be that without the ability to effectively convey his or her mind, an individual may not achieve success career or social life. If people gets to know how to express themselves in an effective way, then they may stand better chance of clarifying themselves and avoid misunderstanding, in turn leading to greater potential to succeed in workplace. Given this, it is unsurprising that understanding how to interact and communicate with others enables people to have better future prospects.
In conclusion, despite the fact that the counter argument may hold true in many cases, I feel affirmative on the advantages of being a good listener.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d points and offer logical conclusion. To begin with, there are several reasons...
^^^
Line 4, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun occasion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many occasions'.
Suggestion: many occasions
... a talk. To cite an example, there are many occasion when a person asks question to a speake...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...son and this allows listener to respond in an appropriate way. However, It has to be admitted tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ener to respond in an appropriate way. However, It has to be admitted that smoo...
^^^
Line 6, column 318, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... gets to know how to express themselves in an effective way, then they may stand better chance of c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eople to have better future prospects. In conclusion, despite the fact that th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, as to, i feel, in conclusion, in many cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99667774086 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96281073994 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551495016611 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.3185823741 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.727272727 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3636363636 20.9669160288 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.344015661806 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139832822014 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16067018753 0.071462118173 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182282327718 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0721307739234 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.