It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example.
Recently, the phenomenon of studying a film at school to learn literature and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of hard-working students are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing to learn literature can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying films at schools can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of learning literature, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of astute children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of important education methods are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, studying literature can provide the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of useless films are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient learning. Hence, predicted outcomes of awful education are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of studying a film at school to learn literature far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of responsible children prove the significance of efficient education, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70689655172 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24063408528 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64224137931 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1582530046 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288211025416 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924132923297 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849486929133 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162154341251 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562116547495 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1324.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70689655172 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24063408528 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64224137931 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1582530046 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.363636364 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288211025416 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924132923297 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849486929133 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162154341251 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562116547495 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.74 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.