It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated. There are many scholars who study locally. To what extend do you agree that this can effect a quality education?
Recently, the phenomenon of overrated studying overseas and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of efficient education are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing with sophisticated scholars can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, studying abroad can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of professional authorities, are remarkable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of overrated sources. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of education's quality are significant.
From a scientific point of view, studying overseas can supply the community with negative influences which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient education are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described local tutors. Hence, predicted outcomes of awful educational quality are notable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of overrated studying overseas by scholars far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of experienced students prove the significance of the local study, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86995515695 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27889481986 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654708520179 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2544168094 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310162906559 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937019079581 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414548730629 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163163421648 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211263259198 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.28 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.