It is said that for some developed countries, tourism may cause some disadvantages. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading
It is often believed that in few developed nations, tourism industry might have negative impact. However, others feel that it is beneficial. In my perspective, I partially agree in the foregoing argument due to the increase in pollution for the former and covenience for the latter. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.
To begin with, the advent of technology has led to proliferation of tourism in many progress countries. As tourism grows, people also increases in number. For this reason, pollution in many forms like air, land among others may be a large problem. The environment is greatly affected because of the garbages being thrown anywhere and destruction of physical surroundings as visiting people do not mind inflicting damage to nature. To illustrate, government of Australia is constantly changing its policy during provision of tourist visa because of the rise of environmental concerns emanating from the non-citizens.
On the other hand, developed countries has all the means of resources available at hand. People can easily, fastly, and comfortably access transportation and lifestyle they want to experience. Better features are seen on these places which visitors can enjoy. For example, visiting Japan would provide people total amusement in high-technology machines they exhibit in musuems and district malls.
To recapitulate, progressive nations will generally experience both benefit and drawback as a result of tourism. It is indeed a reality to every country to face with.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50210970464 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06517941127 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68776371308 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.7932497273 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.9333333333 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129254478433 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381098431633 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0287073170682 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693159570759 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255015597459 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.