keeping pet
importance oft which was always dab-table has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate the negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which was further exlpain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that pets are very important for human . Another pivotal aspect of this trend is thatsome pets are very dangruos for human . pets bad effect refaction on humans and become to sicks hence peoeple stay a dog , cat is apparent why many are against this trend.
Steps to deal with this problem are many but the most significant ones are not complictaed but accessible and practicable the dangrous pet is a noy stay peopele Besid. 80 parcent people stay pets primarily 20 parcent peoeple not stay pets.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the problem of keeping pets can be successfully addressed, provided that the above stated me taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Importance
importance oft which was always dab-table has now ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that pets are v...
^^
Line 3, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eponderant one stems from the fact that pets are very important for human . Anot...
^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... that pets are very important for human . Another pivotal aspect of this trend is...
^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hatsome pets are very dangruos for human . pets bad effect refaction on humans a...
^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Pets
...some pets are very dangruos for human . pets bad effect refaction on humans and be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ery dangruos for human . pets bad effect refaction on humans and become to sicks...
^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s for human . pets bad effect refaction on humans and become to sicks hence peoe...
^^
Line 3, column 328, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...become to sicks hence peoeple stay a dog , cat is apparent why many are against th...
^^
Line 5, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the dangrous pet is a noy stay peopele Besid. 80 parcent people stay pets prima...
^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt people stay pets primarily 20 parcent peoeple not stay pets. According to t...
^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...each to a conclusion that the problem of keeping pets can be successfully address...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 204.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10784313725 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69090364925 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637254901961 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 379.143842365 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5566270787 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.33497536946 225% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20308313323 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748129238202 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069836863226 0.071462118173 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126411915841 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0795525540972 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.