The law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of changing human behavior and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that changing laws can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, good laws can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that human activity, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered social developments. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both accordingly complicated procedures and this common phenomenon apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, bad laws might increase the consequences of community standards. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with improving society relatives. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of establishing community laws.
To conclude, there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of social behavior far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of rules and laws prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1345.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74786324786 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30618188089 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67094017094 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8095759302 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.272727273 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217268444476 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677130503511 0.0925447433944 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666932386043 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111570224521 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599895234668 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.