learning a new language can literally change the way you see the world.Learning Japanese, for example, which has basic terms for light and dark blue, may help you perceive the colour in different ways
Recently, the phenomenon of learning new languages has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “Will be the ability to learn more than one language less important in the future?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that knowing another language is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the communicative standpoint, the effective communication is bound up inextricably with the people’s command of language, which indicates they lead to both social networking sites and sharing opinions. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the webcast and multinational interactions as well as an exponential increase in the broadening horizon. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of internationalization is correlated positively with not only the local dialect but also dominant language.
Within the realm of education, without the slightest doubt, the improving linguistic skills attribute to foreign and modern languages, in that it would come down to the latest information, scientific discoveries, and final research reports. A salient example of such attribution is professional associations, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take international conferences for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint studying abroad problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the globalization, global training, and even common experiments. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of educational dimension of learning various languages.
Within the realm of society and culture, without the slightest doubt, the utilizing a common language attribute to the vernacular language, in that it would come down to the less cultural shock, understanding the social customs, and being familiar with cultural diversity. A salient example of such attribution is the dominant culture, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take the being updated for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the culture clash problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to the social conversation, intercultural relations, and even using the multi -media as a part of modern youth culture. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of sociocultural dimension of jargon and native language.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely disagree that learning more than one language will be less important in the future. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 31.9359605911 172% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2540.0 1207.87684729 210% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 444.0 242.827586207 183% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72072072072 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 3.92707691288 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29614019967 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 139.433497537 171% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538288288288 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 787.5 379.143842365 208% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 8.0 1.56157635468 512% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.65517241379 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.382934389 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.111111111 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107727968863 0.242375264174 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030404225375 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430366507617 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.063140825155 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320677478378 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 153.0 55.0591133005 278% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.