Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future prospects or does it have some adverse effects as well?
Language is an important means of communication. In today’s global world, multilingual person is always at an advantage.Therefore, parents want their children to learn a new language at an early age. However, many people argue that is not good for a child’s growth.
At an early age, while children are burdened with a wide range of topics to study, adding a new language to this list might overwhelm them. In fact, it has been observed that it slows down student’s growth making them slow. Additionally, too much emphasis on learning of new language might lead to ignorance of fundamental subjects like Science and Mathematics, which are far more important to learn than an additional language.
However, learning a new language has various benefits. Firstly, it improves listening skills by making the brain work harder to distinguish between languages. Also, a child now has a wide range of vocabulary using which he can express oneself much more effectively. Secondly, it activates multiple parts of the brain, which deal with multitasking. Therefore, learning a new language makes children better at multitasking, which is very crucial in today’s fast life. Lastly, it is proven fact that learning is much easier while the brain is still in developing stages, because it can be re-wired easily. Hence, children can learn a new language at an early age without putting in too much effort.
In conclusion, it is clear that learning a new language at an early age is not only relatively easy, but also assists in development of the brain. Thus, I am of the opinion that children should be taught a new language at an early age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ingual person is always at an advantage.Therefore, parents want their children to learn a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06227106227 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0494719994 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.475836413 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1333333333 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122234106559 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047507701782 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377789867188 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881044783197 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0143497658875 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.