Long distance communication is helpful for both doctors and patients. Give your opinions about this statement.

Essay topics:

Long distance communication is helpful for both doctors and patients. Give your opinions about this statement.

In the medical science, there are several medical cases which may have very critical for doctors so sometimes it is required for special treatment. For this main reason, long distance communication is really helpful in such a case. So, I will discuss my point in further paragraphs.

Begin with, actually, the communication between doctor and patient is good but it is too tough to understand the patient’s pysical condisions by doctor because the doctors cannot understand real problem of patient when they touch to patients pysical condisions and their feelings. Moreover, it is fact, medical treatment is very sensitive part and parcel in medical science so that it may be possible to danger for patient life. In this case, that communication must be powerful between them.

On the other hand, sometimes it may be possible to come such cases when the patients have to get information regarding emergency treatments when the distances are too long between them so that situation the communication is very helpful for patient’s life. Many special medical cases can be solved by their specialties. Furthermore, in the advance technology, whatever the doctor and patient come corner in the world but through this powerful technology can provide good communication between them. For example, the effective network system have good features like we connect via high quality video call and can check every points and positions of there’s actual situations.

In conclusion, it may be risky when the long distance communication between the doctor and the patient for treating their special requirement. But the upgraded technology can good help in these situations.

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...such a case. So, I will discuss my point in further paragraphs. Begin with, ac...
^^
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her paragraphs. Begin with, actually, the communication between doctor and pat...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, really, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38636363636 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94048714441 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518939393939 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.4668801528 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58333333333 7.25397266985 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210237640442 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958842652002 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0880936598427 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166318656893 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470943136895 0.0609392437508 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.