Recently, the phenomenon of gathering good schools and facilities in cities, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that forcing new teachers and doctors to work villages cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that letting everyone for free choice can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to give people a free choice for their workplace. At first, forcing teachers and doctors to work in the countryside in the earlier years of their employment is beneficial. However, this kind of pressor results negatively. For example, a bad workplace could reduce the performance and loyalty of the workers.
In addition, good infrastructures and modern workplaces attract specialists to rural areas automatically. Moreover, a good wage could be an encouraging decision for governments to benefit from the expertise of educated people. From a scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that providing a good income and modern environment is the best encouragement to attract educated people to work in the country.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that providing better equipment and tools could attract specialists to work in rural areas.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of gathering go...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erformance and loyalty of the workers. In addition, good infrastructures and mo...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ducated people to work in the country. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46666666667 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16469412248 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604444444444 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8617924578 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.818181818 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228630816297 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742888982202 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345863587494 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121132391207 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496676541654 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.