Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.
These days social networking sites play a pivotal role in our life, and many people and business rely on social media for chatting to business promotion. On the flip-side, it brings negative outcomes to people's lives. In this essay, I shall shed a light on both aspects of social networking sites and state my own opinion.
The social media helps to connect with colleague and family even you are far from them. These days Facebook, Twitter, and Google plus seem to be helpful sites to keep in touch with the loved one. Another valuable result of such sites is to grow a professional career. There are a number of websites that help to connect with someone with similar background and professional job. People can share their ideas, passion, and sometimes they can even find their dream job easily. LinkedIn.com, Stackoverflow.com, and Youtube.com are well known social networking sites for graduates to professional persons to promotes themselves and their businesses.
However, we should not turn a blind eye to the expected undesirable outcome which is its negative usage. It is easy to spread scams and unnecessary advertisements using social media which may harm both individuals and society. There are a lot of cases where social networking sites have been proved to be harmful, for example, exposing people's personal life to the world, pirating someone's work to the world, running a fake virtual company, and stealing people's personal details.
I would, therefore, argue that although social networking sites have a negative impact by its misuse to people lives, these are outweighed by the advantages. Responsible parties and the government should enforce strong web policy to address such issues so everyone could take advantages of social networking sites.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23157894737 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78326352747 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60701754386 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4145848568 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373612432165 0.242375264174 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109031744362 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730278521802 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219273179558 0.151781067708 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614602578874 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.