recently, the phenomenon of imitating celebrities by many young people and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that imitating actors and athletes can be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly devastating and negative by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mimicking celebrities can be a minus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss the copy of celebrities' lifestyle. At first, having a pattern for young people to build their future is a great advantage. However, imitating celebrities in the sport such as soccer players can misguide teen people into the wrong activities. For example, the football players are involved in fashion and luxury-oriented that is a bad pattern for financial management.
In addition, following famous scientists can lead young people to a brilliant future. But, mimicking the life of movie actors can make the teenagers addicted to alcohol and cigaret as they involved to them. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2016 has shown that a significant number of celebrities are involved with smoking and alcohol.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this topic, I profoundly believe that despite the requirement of a sample for teenagers future, the drawbacks of imitating celebrities far outweighed its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
recently, the phenomenon of imitating ce...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recently
recently, the phenomenon of imitating celebritie...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... bad pattern for financial management. In addition, following famous scientists...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...are involved with smoking and alcohol. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47368421053 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11361499514 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59649122807 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.165541334 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.454545455 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166426117405 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652104534729 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407034418612 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946364345476 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358941032763 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.