Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?
In this day and age, there is an ongoing debate about the impact of mass media as TV, newspaper and radio, in particular the young, which can shape the society. While there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary, yet I still believe that it has brought significant changes to shape societies. Therefore, in this essay the primary reasons associated with this phenomenon are as follows.
To begin with, one point which I believe to be absolutely pivotal is the fact that these technologies have revolutionized the way we live. For instance, Western culture is what becoming increasingly prevalent among adolescents in my country and less developed nations. Moreover, there are many and various TV series which would be able to adversely affect on the young or even more mature people. Thus, this makes it clear that why children should be controlled by parents and also local authorities so as to curb every medium content.
Secondly, this is particularly so given the fact that it has changed dramatically immatures’ charactristics. Additionally, when it comes to mass media being exposed to inappropriate programes, the young have a tendency to absorb more aggressive behavior which has a huge influence on their personality traits. After analyzing this, it is evident that something must be done in order to prevent negative effect of such relatively novel approachs.
As seen above, my personal sentiment is that each and every individual may incline to view this differently, but I do hold the belief that not only should young people be more aware of the negative aspects of such media, but they also would be able to keep up with these means of communication in a way that have the least affect on their character and traditions.
As seen above, my personal sentiment is that each and every individual may incline to view this differently, but I do hold the belief that not only should young people be more aware of the negative aspects of such media, but they also would be able to keep up with these means of communication in a way that have the least affect on their character and traditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...series which would be able to adversely affect on the young or even more mature people. T...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...d by parents and also local authorities so as to curb every medium content. Secondly,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 266, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...they also would be able to keep up with these means of communication in a way that have the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 324, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...munication in a way that have the least affect on their character and traditions. As s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 266, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'these means'?
Suggestion: this means; these means
...they also would be able to keep up with these means of communication in a way that have the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 324, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...munication in a way that have the least affect on their character and traditions.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in particular, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 5.94088669951 269% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 20.9802955665 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 357.0 242.827586207 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95518207283 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85559632995 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 379.143842365 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.931034482759 537% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.1058391305 50.4703680194 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.416666667 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.75 20.9669160288 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.25397266985 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139571115467 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559719571031 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067223880691 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0838853498284 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424318165963 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.