Medical technology is responsible for the human life expectay. To what extect do you agree or disagree.
The discussion on medical technology is responsible for the human life expectay is a debate topic and people around the globe are divided in their argument. The subject attracts majority of view from people and remain a hot topic among people of concern. In this, I shall scrutinize both points of view by provided some relevant examples and explanation before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain of this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that now day medical technology is increasing time by time which is more fine because there are many important role play in human life. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that in these 60% diseases is moving day by day which for medical technology puts a damper on them with this other people of very helpful. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that in these medical technology is moving but this is not good way because all problem solution is not medical technology however any problems of solution with rest are also fine. Besides, the medical technology is not good in human life. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments mentioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of medical technology are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f reasons which will further explain of this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04597701149 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60024288224 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.2334666493 50.4703680194 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.727272727 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203158454703 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898721158639 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113351705754 0.071462118173 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122485084698 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366583340722 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.