Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Or Medical technology helps to live long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
recently, phenomenon of medical technology in regards to human's life expectancy has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is medical technology responsible for the human's life expectancy?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is not highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the science perspective standpoint, medical achievements are bound up inextricably with scientific research, which indicates they lead to both innovative design and major enhancement. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between health workers and health discovery as well as an exponential increase in life expectancy. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of recent technology is correlated positively with not only body immune system but also fatal mortality.
Within the realm of public belief, without the slightest doubt, new medical achieve attribute to chronic disease, in that it would come down to treatment, cure, and prevent. A salient example of such attribution is incurable disease, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take pill killer for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint unhealthy diet and less exercise problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to ageing, serious ill, and even air pollution. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of health discovery and medical technology improvement.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of medical technology on human 's life expectancy are of more importance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recently
recently, phenomenon of medical technology in re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
...ently, phenomenon of medical technology in regards to humans life expectancy has sparked an o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... medical technology responsible for the humans life expectancy?'. Whereas it is a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the science perspective standpoint,...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e system but also fatal mortality. Within the realm of public belief, witho...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd medical technology improvement. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1746.0 1207.87684729 145% => OK
No of words: 303.0 242.827586207 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76237623762 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16827557729 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5350677732 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.307692308 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253775230964 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700326403295 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0928236942633 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151366784293 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730319742869 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.72 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.