more information available online so library books are useless. agree or disagree with the statement
Recently, the phenomenon of internet development and its corresponding impacts on libraries has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of conventional library's book is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that online e-books can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, online information can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that accessibility as well as high-speed data gathering. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that students who use online research are not required to extend their assignments deadlines. Thus, the beneficial consequences of online libraries and its accessibility apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of learning, online data and e-books might increase the consequences of less traditional libraries usage. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of paper books related to this reality that the demerits of paper books pertain to long searching process. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of books are correlated negatively with time-consuming searching. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of online information as a key tool for high-speed searching.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of e-books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of online data prove the significance of accessibility, but also pinpoint libraries implication
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'libraries'' or 'library's'?
Suggestion: libraries'; library's
...se the consequences of less traditional libraries usage. Moreover, the fundamental aspect...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1511.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70188679245 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30793838972 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3117497133 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.916666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226886626972 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078845047188 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289422725804 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129293200929 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339997882663 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.