More information available online so library books are useless. Agree or disagree with the statement?
The importance of information online or in library books, which were always debatable; has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of library books has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this on people over the years. Both ways of getting information are helpful for students and other people. Here, I will discuss both aspects of this statement, thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, people read library books because there is more information available with good examples because these books are written by some famous persons and the information is based on their point of view. Secondly, people are more likely to visit libraries because they want peaceful atmosphere while getting information. Another key justification for upholding this notion is that people need more information with different examples so they can easily get this in library.
On the other hand, people are becoming lazy now-a-days. They do not want to go libraries so they just search on internet because there is more information on internet. The main thing is that they can search information without going to any library. Moreover, humans can watch some videos related to their topics.
From what has been discussed above it can be concluded that the impact of information online or in library books is prominent. But I believe that library books are more helpful for students.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24561403509 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72816889312 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6734274594 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334138167315 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111609870767 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816546429332 0.071462118173 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205532056097 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637170988301 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 55.0591133005 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.