More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement?
Recently the phenomenon of online information and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of written books is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that physical books can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, Libraries and books could provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of studying, as well as gaining knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of ancient books. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both keeping old documents and precious writers' books apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, available online information might increase the consequences of information overload. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the learning environment could relate to this reality that the demerits of weak educational performances pertain to limited knowledge. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of surfing the internet is correlated negatively with inappropriate content. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of misusing of cyber data.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe the pros of library books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of cognitive skills prove the significance of academic qualifications, but also pinpoint educational achievement implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76447876448 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29409481618 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671814671815 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6085007711 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162411471846 0.242375264174 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505310993577 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053891946502 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0840453771919 0.151781067708 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196482892176 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.