Recently, the phenomenon of the homes full of labor-saving devices and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that it made our life more complicated, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that these computer technologies improved our life, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support to live in this kind of houses are the sign of developed nations. At first, making people less exercise is the negative effects of these gadgets. However, these devices designed for the human's convenience and comfort. For example, by devices such as dishwasher and washing machines people do not force to wash the things by their hands.
In addition, less activities caused by the modern houses make people lazy and sick related to less exercise. But, recent technologies such as vacuum cleaners enhanced the speed of works in these houses, which do not need to any servant for works. For instance, a recent research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2016 has shown that a significant number of people do their homework faster with this devices.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this topic, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using the gadgets equipped with computer technologies far outweighed their drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of the homes fu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...However, these devices designed for the humans convenience and comfort. For example, b...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 358, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'washing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: washing
...nd washing machines people do not force to wash the things by their hands. In addi...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rce to wash the things by their hands. In addition, less activities caused by t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 18, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun activities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...hings by their hands. In addition, less activities caused by the modern houses ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 407, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...of people do their homework faster with this devices. In conclusion, while ther...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir homework faster with this devices. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1206.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26637554585 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86965024801 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633187772926 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.19104131 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.636363636 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.25397266985 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.33497536946 150% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168354407499 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0565108419809 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039086491622 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851919166206 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275579839639 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.