Now doctors can talk to patients by using internet-based communication in the office. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages.
With the advancement of technology live has become much easier but at the same time there are demerits of it too. One such case is of doctors using internet to interact with their patients. This essay will discuss merits and demerits of this method.
On one hand, doctors are easily accessible to patients with technology. Patients in far flung areas, where qualified doctors are not available locally, can communicate with the best doctors by use of internet. For example, there are limited specialists in neurology in Pakistan so people living in under developed areas are unable to get services of specialists. But with the internet, they can interact with a qualified doctor in any part of Pakistan and get the treatment accordingly. Therefore, doctors communicating through internet with patients prove beneficial to many people.
On the other hand, using internet based communication can be a disadvantage. In this case, some people cannot be diagnosed properly as they are far from the reach of doctors and their physical check up is impossible. For instance, a patient having cancer cannot be diagnosed and treated by using internet. Thus, use of internet in such cases have a downside.
In conclusion, patients can get access to doctors by internet but in some cases such cases this access may not be useful for the treatment of the patients. Therefore, use of internet by doctors for treatment of patients can be fruitful as well as harmful.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0875 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80524991459 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508333333333 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.1850870121 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2142857143 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1428571429 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329949302664 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140191857954 0.0925447433944 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0974632812308 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208800700481 0.151781067708 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606265309624 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.