Nowadays the most high-level jobs are done by men, should jobs be reserved for women by the government? What are the effects of this?
recently, the phenomenon of taking the most high-level jobs by men, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that reserving jobs for women cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that jobs' reservation by the government cannot be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to dismiss reserving job positions for females. At first, saving jobs for women could help them to occupy better and high-level jobs. However, this kind of reservation can bring many disadvantages for industries. For example, if a job opportunity saves for the only female gender, they may not afford the work appropriately.
In addition, giving high-level jobs to women could benefit more income and a better financial situation. But justice in society is not equal job division for both genders. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2018 has shown that a significant number of men specialists lose god job positions that to women without ability consideration.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this topic, I profoundly believe that the negative effects of saving job opportunities for women far outweighed its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
recently, the phenomenon of taking the m...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 6, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Recently
recently, the phenomenon of taking the most high...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...may not afford the work appropriately. In addition, giving high-level jobs to w...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o women without ability consideration. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1175.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38990825688 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10250827767 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642201834862 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6682752238 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.818181818 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8181818182 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.25397266985 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487674446342 0.242375264174 201% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181689704733 0.0925447433944 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406232931502 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284697840252 0.151781067708 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756568436893 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.