Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time at work by some people, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that hard-working is not highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that it can be a minus for personal life, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree with this topic. At first, people work hard to fulfill their lives and their family requirements. However, working until the late time of every day could make people away from their families and their children. For example, they have no time to spend leisure times with their families and play the game with their children, those parents who have lower time for personal life.
In addition, they can provide financial needs for their family such as modern house and luxury cars, those people who spend too much time at work. But they can be involved with mental diseases by less time for refreshing their mind. For instance,e a recent research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2017 has shown that a significant number of people who work for a lot of time, need to visit a psychologist to improve their mental disorders.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of working too much time far outweighed its benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of spending too...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...who have lower time for personal life. In addition, they can provide financial ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , e
... for refreshing their mind. For instance,e a recent research conducted by MIT Univ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ist to improve their mental disorders. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0162601626 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71848814679 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605691056911 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7030607047 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.181818182 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.44142763332 0.242375264174 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171291290587 0.0925447433944 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768150383857 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24988563194 0.151781067708 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101121966166 0.0609392437508 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.