Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of spending too much time at work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of people's working hours is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. Therefore, I am inclined to believe that working extra time can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, having a better personal life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of people's satisfactions and time-consimung jobs are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered the importance of life expectancy in society. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both employees' satisfactions and the work-life balance apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, Staff's responsibilities might increase the consequences of extra-time working. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of working days relate to this reality that the demerits of a private life would relate to people's thinkings. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious univeristy has asserted that the downside of workers' expectations is negatively correlated with the amount of working times. Hence, it is corect to presume the preconceived notion of the time management.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I am inclined to believe that the benefits of personal activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of putting more time for job prove the significance of having more rest in work, but also pinpoint life issues implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...erits of a private life would relate to peoples thinkings. As a tangible example, some ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51263537906 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2550927439 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642599277978 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4192042463 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.25 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304995877354 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967609600781 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692721926119 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166109790285 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360975858484 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.