Recently, the phenomenon of overpopulation and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the government policies cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that overpopulation can be negative, and I will analyze the causes and effects of this problem.
To begin with, there are various reasons to make rules against the increasing population. At first, increasing the population could decrease the shortage of workers in industries. However, a crowded population can be the cause of many problems in modern societies. For example, overpopulation causes more fossil fuel consumption and lack of food sources.
In addition, more fuel consumption affects the environment negatively. Moreover, by environmental problems, governments will face a high financial crisis. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the governments are challenging to solve many environmental issues such as air pollution, and greenhouse emission, which need to a huge budget.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this topic, I profoundly believe that the benefits of rules and legislations from governments in this field far outweighed its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of overpopulati...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he causes and effects of this problem. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consumption and lack of food sources. In addition, more fuel consumption affec...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
...ed that the governments are challenging to solve many environmental issues such as air p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mission, which need to a huge budget. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 202.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79207920792 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40834303941 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638613861386 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8534090793 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.363636364 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166140807322 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553314484383 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637991295375 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091816345986 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368377870432 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.