Online content such as media, videos, consumer-generated content or blogs is accessible to all users at no cost in technically advanced society today. to what extent do you agree people should pay for online content or not?
Nowadays, there is an ongoing debate on the free accessibility of the online content, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention of the public. It can be disagreed that audience should pay for media, videos, and blogs, while on the other hand stands a perspective that there should be certain charges to access the information from the online sites. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are innumerable reasons why online content should be free of any cost but the most conspicuous on stems from the fact that free access can be helpful for the people who belongs to the poor families. For instance, a recent survey done by the Sydney University reveals that majority of the clients who use online content are not much rich so by using free services they can educate themselves about the recent developments. Thereby, online content should be free of cost.
Nevertheless, some people holding an opposing view and tend to believe that by applying some fees on the asseccibility of online content writers and news media can generate more profit. Although, online companies like as YouTube, Google and Testbig are paying the publishers, but that salary is a very little for publishers. Therefore, people should pay for online content.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some concernes, the role of free online content in providing information to all level of people is instrumental indeed.
Comments
The most important component…
The most important component is producing interesting and worthwhile material that will increase view hours. The SMM Pak panel is one of the finest panels for purchasing YouTube view time and other services related to YouTube out of all the SMM panels, even if there are many SMM panels. Using SMM Pak Panels, you can easily and inexpensively grow your YouTube channel and generate worthwhile watch hours.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08366533865 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70170640017 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585657370518 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.9053205923 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358447932805 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170456142254 0.0925447433944 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107948501371 0.071462118173 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217001482089 0.151781067708 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539808612215 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.