Online materials like music, movies, etc. are accessible at no cost. Do you think online material should be accessed at no cost?
In this era of technology, almost everything such as music,movies,news is available online. Some people believe that there should be a cost for accessibility to these materials while some argue that it should be free. This essay will discuss how making access to online material will be beneficial.
To begin with, free material will help a poor person to have access to learning. In this world many are unable to go to school or get even basic education because of financial issues. For example, according to a survey conducted by Higher Education of Pakistan, almost 50 percent of children did not go to school in last 10 years because of financial constraints of their parents. Therefore, with free material available online, children of poor people will also have an opportunity to learn ultimately it will help in improving the literacy rate of the nation.
Secondly, easy access to online material will help in usage of time efficiently. In cases where deep understanding of a topic is required some people prefer to go to a library which consumes their time in travelling too. For instance, I used to go to British council library when I was in school for some of my assignments as internet was not common in that time and on those days I was unable to do any other activities. Thus, with easy access to material online time wastage in travelling can be used in some other useful activity.
To conclude, access to online material is beneficial for poor people as well as for efficiency of a person. In my opinion, access to online material should be free of charge to get better results for individuals as well as for a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , movies
...hnology, almost everything such as music,movies,news is available online. Some people b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Secondly, easy access to online material will help in usage of time efficiently. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79225352113 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79539989329 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510563380282 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2243106308 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.692307692 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.25397266985 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25347590315 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107811116026 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882095800246 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175705740084 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903221772988 0.0609392437508 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.