The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the rapid urbanization depends on the unemployment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the dealing with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Hence, the beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the introducing rapid urbanization is the effective way to deal with unemployment might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the drawback of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of to introduce rapid urbanization we should dealing with unemployment in the effective way far outweigh of its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of this total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 395, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e thorny issues potential implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71326164875 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36343597124 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.6093311695 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.909090909 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322497091921 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121756470926 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138455023961 0.071462118173 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208073221248 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419334570884 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.