The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. To what extent do you agree with it?
Recently, the phenomenon of effective ways to deal with unemployment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of rapid urbanization are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing with an effective way can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, practical ways to deal with unemployment can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of efficient urbanization, are considerable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of increasing employment. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of urban areas are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, inefficient approaches to deal with unemployment can supply the community with negative impacts that are associated with the reality that the demerits of introducing rapid urbanization are horrible. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described incremental unemployment rate. Hence, predicted outcomes of atrocious ways are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of effective ways to deal with rapid urbanization far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of dealing with unemployment prove the significance of an urban region, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75732217573 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38891987624 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615062761506 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5093618789 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.090909091 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7272727273 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475044111837 0.242375264174 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159371435311 0.0925447433944 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114898412192 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287980244423 0.151781067708 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598312391037 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.