Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of the behavior of the children and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by substantial by number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that responsing for child behaivor can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, parent behavior can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that children activity, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which are discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramification of financial responsiblity and social accountiblity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, suportive parent might increase the consequences of reaching to adulthood. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct that to presume the preconceived notion of this phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of social responibility far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lieve that responsing for child behaivor can be a plus and I will analyze that th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79574468085 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31763195012 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68085106383 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2933447564 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.818181818 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3636363636 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1126317243 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345969318736 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421272091575 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0565793525652 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320222112224 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.