Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of parents responsibilty of children and its corresponding impcats have sparked a heated debate. Although contested bay many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positivie by a substantial number of individual. I am inclined believe that breeding children with parents can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint parents resposibility and training thier childrens whit propertion instruments can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university students, I performed an academic experiment which dicovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, irresposibity of children’s actions might increase the cosequencs of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific reseach undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that down side of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of resposibility of children’s acts and behavior far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significanse of total outcomes, but only pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: DOWN_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'downside'?
Suggestion: downside
...restigious university has asserted that down side of creative processes is correlated neg...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92741935484 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4134916256 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689516129032 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5304165337 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.636363636 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103866010405 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362019400733 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036674576005 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059443720796 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278118538965 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.41 11.5310837438 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.