Parents are responsible for their children’s behavior. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, whether parent should respond to their children behaviour sparked a heated argument. Either children well behaviour is important or not even become controversial. There is a compelling notion on both sides of arguments. In this essay I will elaborate both side arguments and explain why I believe parent should respond to their children behaviour.
A new research from the University of Ohio found children behavior are influenced by their parent moods, interpersonal skill and communication skill. The parent, who have a high level of interpersonal and communication skill tends behave more calmly under stress, in order to they have a better problem solving skills. Children would easily mimic their parent behavior and respond how to deal with difficult situation or people. Therefore, those children have a better behavior when they are in similar situation.
But despite parent behaviour has profoundly influence to their children, children is also developed their own behavior pattern due to their peer groups influences, according to a study found from the University of Standford. As children spent long time in school, which has exposed themselves into peer groups influences, which were found equally influential from their parent. However, parent can not deny their responsiblity as a guardian who provide guidelines to their children how to behave as a responsible person in society.
In my conclusion, as per arguments mentioned above, I am inclined to think that parent is responsible to children's behaviour, even though peer groups have played a huge part of it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new research'.
Suggestion: New research
...pond to their children behaviour. A new research from the University of Ohio found child...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48790322581 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92173479446 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588709677419 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8035937604 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.416666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.58333333333 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275340976233 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114360361675 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622819246275 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165742153196 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544665814524 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.