Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples
Recently, the phenomenon of the resposible of children’s act and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both costructive and cosequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that parents responcibles can be a plus, and I will analyzed that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, legaly responsibles of parents can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own legaly acts, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly comlpelicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, children’s activity might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university ihas asserted that the down side of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compling arguments on both sides, I perofoundly believe that the benefit of doing crime of childrens far outhweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this inique phenomenon prove the significance total outcomes, but also pinpoint throny issues’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'analyze'
Suggestion: analyze
... responcibles can be a plus, and I will analyzed that throughout this essay. From a ge...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: DOWN_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'downside'?
Suggestion: downside
...gious university ihas asserted that the down side of creative processes is correlated neg...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78838174274 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36907997599 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688796680498 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3210981577 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.818181818 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121180251176 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040432576055 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0273992751889 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0655408849146 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159900905574 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.16 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.