Recently, the phenomenon of the legal responsibilities of parents and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of children's antisocial behavior is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive. I am inclined to believe acquiring parenting skills can be a plus, and I will elaborate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, legislating against irresponsible parents can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of nurturing disciplined children, as well as giving a good upbringing, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between children's behavior and parenting styles. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being legally responsible and having courteous children apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, raising children's awareness of their social actions might increase the consequences of parental responsibilities. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of family rules could relate to this reality that the demerits of inattentive children pertain to illegal actions. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a highly prestigious university has asserted that the downside of negligent parents is correlated negatively with juvenile delinquency and children’s crime rates. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of being in charge of our children's actions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe the benefits of legally responsible parents far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of law-abiding generations prove the significance of well-behaved children but also pinpoint the social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90579710145 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34263824154 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659420289855 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6906871133 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.833333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234435494396 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823181332539 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042324930344 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134417869588 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263881760955 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.