People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, white-water river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why?
In the recent past, a lot of sporting activities have increased such as skydiving, biking, white-water rafting etc. Furthermore, studies have shown that people tend to enjoy themselves by indulging in such activities. But, these activities are really terrific and dangerous. This essay will discuss, why these people should pursue these activities.
These activities are not that dangerous as it seems. As a result, you should have a proper command on yourself to out maneuver these activities. If a group of people, for instance, decides to go on a rafting trip, then they should hire a guide and do some training, otherwise, the waves and the rapids would pose a great threat in their life. Similarly, other activities needs to be practiced before doing the actual stunt.
Furthermore, activities like motorcycle sports have a competition attached to it which is witnessed by a lot of people. These people tend to enjoy themselves and refresh their minds. Apart from this, it serves as a life time achievement. If you do a skydiving course, then it would represent as a great event and also adds up in your CV. Furthermore, you will be able to replenish yourself in future and be an adventurous person.
Pursuing activities like river rafting, skydiving etc is on the rise and certainly it is considered as a deadly sport. In my opinion, people should follow whatever they like, should do whatever they want to but of course there should be a particular age bar to do it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 216, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
... minds. Apart from this, it serves as a life time achievement. If you do a skydiving cour...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, really, similarly, so, then, apart from, for instance, of course, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82958371497 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.9358522889 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3333333333 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264701838943 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08048782187 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585845716129 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149915276939 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042972047588 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.