It's an irrefutable fact that governments are having difficult financial circumstances which are impacting the budget allotment for the people who are in the age of the elderly. The number of people who are in the workforce due to retirement is increasing and this poses a huge burden on the countries economy. In this following essay, I will discuss the reasons behind the issue of handling of the elderly and provide suggestion in tackling this issue.
At the outset, there are numerous ways in which the programs associated with elderly are causing heavy toll to the government on the economic front, but the most conspicuous one is rooted in the fact that the government failure in curating economic policy in accordance with population demographics. If government made proper planning about the number of people are retiring, then they will be no financial constraint for investing in the healthcare of the elderly. Moreover, taking care of people who have already retired is the moral duty of any government. Thus, government agencies should revamp the existing economic policies to tackle this issue.
In my opinion, the best approach to overcome the issue of financial constraint in investing healthcare of elderly people is to increase the age of retirement, so that people can work more and earn more. This can increase the income level of the people. Thereby, individuals who are old will be less depended on the government for financial help. For instance, Japan had more number of people who are not in the workforce due to retirement than the people who are in the workforce. Then Japan revamped its policy on retirement. Thus, promoting its economy.
In conclusion, the cost of healthcare of elderly is a huge burden on countries' economy; however, by changing the economy and retirement policy, the government can not only take care of its elderly but also can promote the economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ing and this poses a huge burden on the countries economy. In this following essay, I wil...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...althcare of elderly is a huge burden on countries economy; however, by changing the econo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1595.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07961783439 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79372707145 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480891719745 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.4109553633 50.4703680194 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.928571429 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18842118463 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620034000394 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444578429847 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124848928578 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306048965394 0.0609392437508 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.