With the rise in popularity of the internet, newspapers will soon become a thing of the past. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.)
Recently, the popularity of the internet has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “will the newspaper soon become a thing of the past?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that magazines are no longer as ubiquitous as they used to be, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the telecommunication standpoint, online newspapers are bound up inextricably with the internet infrastructure, which indicates they lead to both pervasive news access and keeping updated. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the virtual environment and hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in scientific achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of playing a major role is correlated positively with not only globalization but also changing the world.
Within the realm of journalism, without the slightest doubt, online broadcasting attribute to public awareness, in that it would come down to accurate, instant, and breaking news. A salient example of such attribution is a political agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint editorial system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of international dimensions of cyberculture.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that newspapers will be replaced by cyber journalism. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64726027397 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32184543065 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688356164384 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5699889206 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.846153846 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142586163707 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04052138093 0.0925447433944 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555224728537 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808516989901 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418248543683 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.