The rising level of congestion and air pollution found in most of the world cities can be attributed directly to the rapidly increasing number of private cars in use. In order to reverse the decline in the quality of life in cities, attempts must be made to encourage people to use their cars less and public transport more.
State your opinion and support it with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations.
The increasing levels of traffic and atmospheric pollution as observed in majority of global cities is largely contributed by the growth of ownership of private vehicles. However, many individuals suggest that the way to solve these problems is to convince people to reduce car dependence by utilizing non-private transportation. In my perspective, I completely support with the latter argument due to protection of the environment and to become more healthy. This essay will discuss my justifications for the stated reasons.
To begin with, road congestion and pollution issues are intensified by the use of private vehicles. Cars are powered by engines which emits obnoxious gases in the atmosphere. This is usually been hailed as one of the culprit of damaging the environment. Individuals can help save the Earth by a simple means of reducing dependence on their cars. Whatever their reasons are, they must take into account the deteriorating effects of inconsiderate use of their vehicles especially on its carbon dioxide emissions. Therefore, the solution to this is to find an alternative means of transport like commuting or biking.
Apart from this, city life can be less desired for due to its effects on human health. If working people are used to walking in the streets without any personal protection, they can inhale too much unwanted gases generated from vehicles. This may literally affect their wellness as it will go deep into their lungs causing them sickness. In the worst part, chronic diseases can be acquired for prolong exposure on polluted air. To mitigate this issue, one has to consider becoming a passenger and utilizing public utilities such as buses or trains instead of using one's own car.
To recapitulate, the advantage of utilizing more the general transportations any nation has outweighs the use of private vehicles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, apart from, as to, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26936026936 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97601578529 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9740250044 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8125 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5625 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173778023031 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525191814439 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528891944354 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0951683149938 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317773830471 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.