Recently, the phenomenon of an opinion about the task of schools, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the schools are highly beneficial to prepare students for the university, making the students able for work expected by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical schools can be a plus to finding a job, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support many professional schools to send students to the market after the graduation. The main task of schools is to teach basic lessons of the university. However, practical schools can make students such an experimented worker to attract the job market. For example, there are many jobs occupied by the students of art schools such as pilot and computer programming.
In addition, by the art schools, the students can end up their education period without studying unnecessary lessons such as the Arabic language as well as Geography, which can be unrelated to their career and their future position on the job that will get.
In conclusion, there are several compelling arguments on this statement, the schools can provide students for the market without passing the unnecessary lessons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of an opinion a...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as pilot and computer programming. In addition, by the art schools, the stu...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure position on the job that will get. In conclusion, there are several compell...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15865384615 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85169921706 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 139.433497537 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 379.143842365 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1621403787 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189570753876 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854502558544 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645994034019 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118163359318 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614161317447 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.