Should digital media replace textbooks? what are the reviews and possible solutions.
Recently, whether digital media replace textbooks for tertiary education has become a heated argument. As digital media become commonly used for educational purpose, such as posting journal articles and academic discussion. There are some educational specialists starting to investigate the idea of using digital media as a replacement to textbooks becoming a primary education channel for tertiary education. As digital media allows academic update information lifetime. But textbook publishing has gone through editing process that ensuring the information is accrual. In this essay I will elaborate these two arguments and explain why I believe digital media is beneficiary to tertiary education as a primary education channel.
Digital media is commonly used for retrieving news and entertaining purpose. It also is being widely used by tertiary education institution for posting their article journals and performing academic discussion. Digital media allows academic updates their presentation lifetime. Therefore, their presentation contents will be up to dated. And also, a livetime chat function provides an excellent interaction plaform for lecturer and student to exchange their opinions on the subject. It can enhance the knowledge excahnge.
Despite, there are many benefits of using digital media as primary channel for tertiary education, the process of publishing textbook involves editing and prove reading that ensuring all information published are correct. And also, format of textbook presentation allows words, photograph and graph appear on the same page that easier for reader to understand a complex concept. As digital media can't accommodate all forms of information presented in one page yet.
In conclusion, as per arguments mentioned above, I am inclined to think that textbook provides a more comprehensive platform for author and reader to learn a complex concept than digital media. Therefore, I believe textbook can't be replaced by social media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 411, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ucation channel for tertiary education. As digital media allows academic update in...
^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...and a complex concept. As digital media cant accommodate all forms of information pr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 466, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... information presented in one page yet. In conclusion, as per arguments mentione...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...al media. Therefore, I believe textbook cant be replaced by social media.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 5.75862068966 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1695.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78498293515 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93257685134 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532423208191 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.575468907 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7058823529 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2352941176 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 7.25397266985 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237176009945 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987323614568 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0728193416744 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164625338848 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613286498125 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 53.1260098522 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.