Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)? Why? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience.
Innumerable individuals believe that the administration should allocate more funds on fixing roads and freeways but others suggest the budget should focus on developing public vehicles. In my perspective, it is the duty of the government to ensure the public’s safety by improving public transport. This essay will discuss my justification for the stated reason.
To begin with, when larger portion of financial resources are allotted for augmenting public utilities it would be more patronize by the citizens. It will now be their medium to go from one place to another in a lesser dependence on private cars because this has resulted to road congestion. To illustrate, bullet trains in Japan were able to lessen traffic in urban areas on a daily basis.
Moreover, the choice for concentrating further on government budget into transportation vehicles could ease the burden of difficulties every passenger is experiencing every time pollution up fronts him. With the use of advance technology incorporated into vehicles can be able to provide people convenience, comfort and much safety. For example, all public transport in the US are all air-conditioned and is designed to be energy efficient generating reduced carbon emissions.
To recapitulate, the government should take into account the paramount importance of improving the populace’s transportation as it will give them more advantage than developing the roads. Indeed, it is the proper management of funds of the state to accommodate the needs of its citizens.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, for example, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48319327731 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23202115359 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1361376187 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.636363636 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221572478585 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742259368949 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0687520446704 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132162767876 0.151781067708 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688042607933 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.