Should individual limit the use of car and use alternative things instead to protect environment?
Car usage have significantly increased in the last century. There is an ongoing debate among people that car usage should be limited in order to not harm the environment. This essay will discuss how use of car is harmful for the environment.
First of all, gases are released by the combustion of fuel in the engine. These gases, especially carbon dioxide is extremely detrimental for the ozone layer and is resulting in global warming. For example, due to melting of glaciers there has been a surge in floods all over the world. Therefore, the consequences of car usage should be realised before its too late.
Secondly, high demand of fuel is created by use of car and results in further drilling in the oceans for procuring of the oil which is later converted in the fuel for the car.This means that marine life is disturbed in the oceans and as a result some of the species are becoming extinct. For instance, blue whale population has significantly reduced in the oceans and they are on verge of extinction. The negative effects of car usage can again be seen.
In conclusion, car usage results in the release of gases and put pressure on demand of fuel consumption. In my opinion, alternate means of transport should be used in our daily life so that our environment can be protected.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...later converted in the fuel for the car.This means that marine life is disturbed in ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...disturbed in the oceans and as a result some of the species are becoming extinct. For insta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 1207.87684729 89% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75221238938 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69999985497 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566371681416 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.8151529984 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200502122702 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684142424632 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062760037107 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12889331422 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622708475977 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.5310837438 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.