Should music and video games offered by universities?
It is irrefutable to say that technology is a mother of inventions. The phenomena of whether the universities should introduce the music and video games to the candidates is highly debatable. I am personally not in the favour of this trend of introducing music and technical games, while people on the other hand stands a perspective that it should be offered by the institutes. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons to support my opinion on why offering the music and video games to the students is a wrong practice, but the most conspicuous on lie in the fact that introducing media can divert the focus of the pupils from the academic subjects. Moreover, the themes of the video games are usually related to the violance activities and fights that can influence the mind and can develop the aggressive behaviour of the students. Therefore, to make the individuals more attentive to the academic areas universities should not offer the video games and music.
Notwithstanding, some people hold and opposing view and tend to believe that to make the pupils familiar with the technology the schools should introduce the video games. Moreover, music can also help the learners to build interest in the studies because other academic subjects are usually too boaring like as, math, science and history. As an illustration, according to the startling new research, there is huge increase in the performance of the kids who study music and video game heads.
In the light of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having a plethora of benefits, the drawbacks of offering the music and video games in making the student less focused towards their study is to dire to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 214, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ent less focused towards their study is to dire to ignore.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75373685501 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546666666667 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4237216394 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.272727273 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.492505117718 0.242375264174 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185592103965 0.0925447433944 201% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167802491505 0.071462118173 235% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289966342468 0.151781067708 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904896037249 0.0609392437508 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.