Recently, the phenomenon of providing organized activities after school lessons, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that additional school activities cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that keeping children at school for more time can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to agree school organized activities for students. At first, spending a lot of time in class may make students less interested in school. However, school activities can provide students more beneficial for society. For example, giving students group functions could prepare students best people for team working such as working well on group projects in their company.
In addition, the schools can provide practical courses to make the students experienced in a career. Moreover, there are many additional courses that make students expertise in their future job. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that there is an essential need for a significant number of technical careers in advanced countries, which can recruit these students. Thus, working on technical positions could make a further annual income for their future jobs.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this question, I profoundly believe that the benefits of school activities far outweighed its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of providing or...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll on group projects in their company. In addition, the schools can provide pra...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r annual income for their future jobs. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.589958159 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93496079242 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594142259414 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7352918039 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291305023489 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114308837038 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895745042594 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168135864558 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085386953533 0.0609392437508 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.