Recently, the phenomenon of helping poor countries with food and education, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that help from wealthy nations cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that it cannot be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support helping poor countries to improve their condition. At first, sending poor countries food and cash can help them to survive for a longer time. But by financial help and feeding them, poor nations become accustomed to wealthy countries and more lazy to improve their situation.
In addition, it is the responsibility of poor countries to make better condition and the best future for themselves. A recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2018 has shown that educational help learned a significant number of lower financial situation countries to improve their economies by using industrial solutions such as using their wildlife and environment for the tourism industry and increase their people's incomes.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of financial helps from wealthy countries to poor nations far outweighed of their benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of helping poor...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...their condition. At first, sending poor countries food and cash can help them to survive ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more lazy to improve their situation. In addition, it is the responsibility of...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ry and increase their peoples incomes. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47727272727 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99579250404 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1709163618 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.888888889 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512162695241 0.242375264174 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20842052 0.0925447433944 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11203225882 0.071462118173 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291768870448 0.151781067708 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103379635899 0.0609392437508 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.